康熙王朝

德国人最担心的事情发生了！中国限定AUDI电动车返销奥迪老家_我的网站

一 |     8月24日消息，德国人最不愿意看到的一幕发生了：     原本由奥迪与上汽联手打造、专供中国市场、没有任何欧洲出口计划的 AUDI E5 Sportback轿跑与E7X SUV两款纯电车，经由德国第三方平行进口商Auto China完成采购、海运、欧盟法规认证，正式登陆奥迪的本土老家德国，可以合法上牌上路行驶！     这两款车型归属奥迪专为中国设立的子品牌AUDI，整车基于联合开发的ADP高级数字化平台打造，外观上不再使用奥迪经典四环车标，车尾替换为大写“AUDI”字母标识。    

    Shipping containers are loaded and unloaded onto ships at the Port of Los Angeles, California, on July 9, 2025. Photo: VCG
When even major US allies and trading partners are swept into Washington's alleged China-linked transshipment network, is the US still cracking down on its so-called illegal tariff evasion, or is it raising its "small yard, high fence" higher and tighten it further by wielding its tariff stick and extending tariff controls across normal global supply chains?
The White House on Thursday released a report identifying roughly 40 economies as participants in what it calls a "Shadow Transshipment Network", alleging that Chinese goods are being routed through third countries to evade higher US tariffs. The list stretches across Asia, Europe and the Americas and includes some of Washington's closest allies and largest trading partners.
Chinese experts said the report is partly aimed at defending Washington's tariff policy by shifting responsibility for its weakened impact onto other economies, while also pressuring them to follow US trade and origin rules. In effect, the US is trying to extend its unilateral trade restrictions beyond its own borders and deeper into global supply chains, they said.
Build 'higher fence'
The 25-page report claims that US import sourcing saw a "substantial reallocation" after the 2018 tariffs, as China's direct share declined and imports from identified transshipment economies rose. It alleges that some goods were routed through lower-tariff jurisdictions, where minor processing, relabeling, repackaging, re-invoicing or paperwork changes were used to create the appearance of a new national origin. 
However, the report itself acknowledges that alleged transshipment risks in several major economies are "embedded within broad legitimate trade flows." It also admitted that the post-2018 shift in US imports "does not establish" that all displaced Chinese trade was illegally transshipped and partly reflected "legitimate changes in production, investment, and sourcing."
False declarations of origin or simple repackaging can amount to tariff circumvention, but investing overseas, building factories abroad or sourcing components across borders are legitimate forms of supply-chain adjustment, experts said.
One purpose of the report is to portray Washington's tariff policy as effective while attributing its diminished impact to the responses of other economies, Zhou Mi, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation, told the Global Times. 
This allows Washington to shift responsibility onto other economies and put itself in a more favorable position in shaping the narrative around its tariff policy, Zhou said.
Cui Fan, a professor at the University of International Business and Economics, told the Global Times that US rules for determining country of origin are not fully aligned with those used by other economies. The latest move could pressure other countries to adopt US standards, but Cui said such an approach is unlikely to work.
"Countries formulate their rules of origin based on a range of factors, including the scale and technological conditions of their own industries," Cui said. "Industrial structures and the global division of labor cannot be reshaped simply through pressure from one country."
Harmonization of rules of origin - applying the same rules across countries regardless of purpose - "would facilitate the flow of international trade," according to WTO on its website. 
It has also warned that misuse of such rules may turn them into "a trade policy instrument" rather than merely a device supporting other trade policy measures, according to WTO.
Washington was pursuing hegemonic politics and unilateral bullying in the economic and trade sphere under the guise of "reciprocity", a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Commerce said when commenting on the US use of tariffs to pressure other countries into restricting economic and trade cooperation with China. 
Disrupting global supply chains

Cui said production and trade networks linking China with South Korea, Europe and other economies have taken shape over years of market-driven specialization. By lowering production and logistics costs and improving efficiency, these networks have benefited businesses and consumers across participating economies.
"The real challenge facing global trade today is not so-called illegal transshipment, but the continued damage that unilateralism and trade protectionism are inflicting on the multilateral trading system," Cui added.
Since returning to office, the Trump administration has made tariffs a centerpiece of its trade policy, rolling out sweeping "reciprocal tariffs" and other broad duties that have drawn widespread criticism at home and abroad. On Thursday, Washington announced new Section 232 tariffs on drones and their parts and components, further expanding the range of products subject to US tariffs.
US tariffs have themselves pushed companies to reconfigure supply chains. Washington is now citing those very adjustments as evidence of circumvention, effectively using the market fallout from its own tariff policy to justify further trade restrictions, Chinese experts noted.
International trade is based on mutual benefit, and sovereign countries have the legitimate right to conduct economic and trade cooperation independently, Cui said. "No country should interfere with normal global trade simply to advance its own unilateral interests."
The report broadens its scrutiny beyond routing and documentation to include China-origin inputs or components, Chinese ownership or financing, relationships with Chinese suppliers or manufacturers, China-based production steps and China-origin routing histories.
Analysts believed the latest move is more than simply making the existing "high fence" higher. By trying to bring more economies and a larger portion of global supply chains within the reach of US tariff enforcement, Washington attempted to make the "yard" itself much bigger.
Cui warned that sustained US pressure to reshape normal trade and supply-chain links could fragment mature regional production networks, and reduce the efficiency of global resource allocation, with the impact extending far beyond China-US trade given the wide range of economies named in the report.
Zhou noted that companies would be forced to redesign supply chains to manage rising policy risks, adding costs that could feed back into the US through higher inflation while creating broader frictions and instability for global trade.
。    深度适配国内车机生态、智能座舱与本土用户使用习惯，研发之初就定位中国市场，大众集团官方明确表态，不会将这两款车官方出口欧洲市场。     价格层面形成强烈反差，E5 Sportback国内起售价20.59万元，E7X国内起售价26.98万元，经过采购、远洋运输、欧盟反补贴关税、增值税、单车认证等多重成本叠加之后，两款车在德国市场售价几乎翻倍，E5 Sportback税前标价59980欧元，E7X起售价72900欧元。    即便成本大幅抬升，对比德国本土生产的奥迪同级电车依旧具备明显优势：     E5 Sportback顶配双电机版本最大可输出776马力，零百加速3.4秒，搭载100kWh 800V高压电池，CLTC续航647公里；而德国本土生产的奥迪S6 Sportback e?tron，动力仅543马力，售价却高出接近2.8万欧元，性能更低、价格更贵，对比鲜明。     硬件配置上，两款中国特供车型配备大尺寸中控屏幕、完整的本土化智能座舱、高阶智驾系统，座舱交互、车联网功能都是按照中国消费者需求调校。    整件事讽刺之处在于，大众集团此前一直在游说欧盟，希望加征关税阻挡中国产电动车流入欧洲市场，结果率先闯入德国市场的，反而是自家在中国合作生产的限定车型。

二 |     德国本土汽车行业对此态度分化，部分经销商表达担忧，提醒进口存在残值、维修的潜在风险；不少普通德国消费者却十分感兴趣，此外还有不少的国网友在社交平台吐槽，同样是奥迪技术，本土在售车型性能弱、定价更高。              

。

Current article:http://r2phfmy.senbatuqiuzhuanlanrilao.sbs/list_h4skhm/xvf.html

Published on:05:25:53